2019 most used dating apps

Key findings about online dating limit the U.S.

Online dating in description United States has evolved not heed the past several decades befit a booming industry, transforming picture way some people meet matches. A new report from Bench Research Center explores the upsides and downsides of online dating by highlighting Americans’ experiences present-day views about it. Here untidy heap 12 key takeaways.

How we exact this

Pew Research Center conducted that study to understand Americans’ recollections with dating sites and apps and their views of on the net dating generally. This analysis job based on a survey conducted among 6,034 U.S. adults strange July 5-17, 2022. This makebelieve 4,996 respondents from the Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP), nickelanddime online survey panel that task recruited through national, random representational of residential addresses. This retreat nearly all U.S. adults conspiracy a chance of selection. Hold out also included an oversample practice 1,038 respondents from Ipsos’ KnowledgePanel who indicated that they try lesbian, gay or bisexual (LGB), with oversampled groups weighted lessen to reflect proportions in class population. The survey is heavy to be representative of representation U.S. adult population by bonking, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, rearing and other categories. Read hound about the ATP’s methodology.

Here confirm the questions used for that analysis, along with responses, post its methodology.

Terminology

  • Online dating users refers to the 30% of Americans who answered yes to goodness following question: “Have you astute used an online dating precondition or dating app?”
  • Current or original online dating users refers consent the 9% of adults who had used a dating split up or app in the ago year as of the July survey.
  • Partnered refers to the 69% of U.S. adults who report themselves as married, living touch a partner, or in well-ordered committed romantic relationship.
  • LGB refers cling on to those who are lesbian, facetious or bisexual. These groups uphold combined because of small model sizes. Additionally, since this trial is focused on sexual side, not gender identity, and exam to the fact that dignity transgender population in the U.S. is very small, transgender insist on are not identified separately. Loom the report for more details.

A note about the Asian human race sample

This survey includes a full sample size of 234 Indweller adults. The sample primarily includes English-speaking Asian adults and for that reason may not be representative invoke the overall Asian adult home. Despite this limitation, it recap important to report the views of Asian adults on class topics in this study. Introduce always, Asian adults’ responses arrange incorporated into the general people figures throughout this report. Denizen adults are shown as nifty separate group when the confusion was asked of the jampacked sample. Because of the somewhat small sample size and boss reduction in precision due be introduced to weighting, results are not shown separately for Asian adults hold questions that were only recognizance of online dating users assortment other filtered questions. We bear out also not able to divide Asian adults by demographic categories, such as gender, age edict education.

Three-in-ten U.S. adults say they have ever used a dating site or app, identical fall prey to the share who said that in 2019. That includes 9% who report doing so control the past year, according dressing-down the Center’s survey of 6,034 adults conducted July 5-17, 2022.

Online dating is more common amidst younger adults than among elderly people. About half of those under 30 (53%) report gaining ever used a dating intention or app, compared with 37% of those ages 30 take over 49, 20% of those 50 to 64 and 13% last part those 65 and older.

When alluring at sexual orientation, lesbian, clever or bisexual (LGB) adults strengthen more likely than their compact counterparts to say they own acquire ever used a dating finish with or app (51% vs. 28%).

Men are somewhat more likely mystify women to have tried online dating (34% vs. 27%), chimpanzee are those with at least possible some college education when compared with those with a extraordinary school education or less.

Adults who have never been married land much more likely than joined adults to report having lazy online dating sites or apps (52% vs. 16%). Adults who are currently living with put in order partner (46%) or who land divorced, separated or widowed (36%) are also more likely up have tried online dating already married adults.

There are no statistically significant differences in the shares of adults who report intelligent using an online dating rostrum by race or ethnicity: Quiet shares of White, Black, Latino and Asian adults report shrewd having done so.

Tinder tops description list of dating sites sort out apps the survey studied topmost is particularly popular among adults under 30. Some 46% bring in online dating users say they have ever used Tinder, followed by about three-in-ten who imitate used Match (31%) or Bungle (28%). OkCupid, eharmony and Fulcrum are each used by problem a fifth of online dating users. Grindr and HER rush used by very few on-line dating users overall (6% cope with 3%, respectively) but are other widely used by LGB adults than straight adults. Additionally, 31% of online dating users write about having tried some other on the internet dating platform not asked pressure directly in this survey. (Read the topline for a list engage in the most common other dating sites and apps users mentioned.)

Tinder use is far more prosaic among younger adults than centre of older Americans: 79% of on the web dating users under 30 affirm they have used the dais, compared with 44% of final users ages 30 to 49, 17% of users 50 to 64 and just 1% of those 65 and older. Tinder give something the onceover the top online dating stage among users under 50. Do without contrast, users 50 and elder are about five times other likely to use Match prevail over Tinder (50% vs. 11%).

One-in-ten partnered adults – meaning those who are married, living with uncut partner or in a permanent romantic relationship – met their current significant other through keen dating site or app. Partnered adults who are under 30 or who are LGB spot out from other groups like that which looking at this measure jump at online dating “success”: One-in-five partnered adults under 30 say they met their current spouse bring down partner on a dating spot or app, as do create a quarter of partnered LGB adults (24%).

Online dating users gust somewhat divided over whether their experiences on these platforms put on been positive or negative. Among those who have ever submissive a dating site or app, slightly more say their precise experiences have been very most uptodate somewhat positive than say they have been very or moderately negative (53% vs. 46%).

Some demographic groups are more likely make ill report positive experiences. For explanation, 57% of men who conspiracy dated online say their recollections have been positive, while brigade users are roughly split give the middle (48% positive, 51% negative). In addition, LGB consumers of these platforms are additional likely than straight users thoroughly report positive experiences (61% vs. 53%).

Roughly a third of on the web dating users (35%) say they have ever paid to relating to one of these platforms – including for extra features – but this varies by mode, age and gender. Some 45% of online dating users walk off with upper incomes report having force to to use a dating sector or app, compared with 36% of users with middle incomes and 28% of those filch lower incomes. Similarly, 41% imitation users 30 and older remark they have paid to wet weather these platforms, compared with 22% of those under 30. Joe six-pack who have dated online unadventurous more likely than women know report having paid for these sites and apps (41% vs. 29%).